Skip to main content

2011 Winner: Eric Mathison


Eric Mathison
attended the University of Calgary for his undergraduate and is Editor in Chief of The Gauntlet, its student publication. Download his winning paper The Insufficiency of Negative Rights for Children and comment on it below.

The Insufficiency of Negative Rights for Children

Abstract: In this paper I argue that negative rights are insufficient for children if the goals of liberal justice are to be fulfilled. I begin by adopting Will Kymlicka’s two preconditions for liberalism: that lives must be led from the inside, and that we must have the freedoms to revise our conceptions of the good life. I focus on the importance of autonomy development in children for those preconditions to obtain. Next I evaluate the right to an open future, which posits that children have the right to choose the type of lives they wish to lead as adults. I argue, however, that approaches of this type cannot fulfill the goals of liberalism because they fail to sufficiently address positive rights.

2011 Short List

Congratulations to the the following applicants whose papers were short listed for the Keenan Prize for 2011!

  • Mike Kryluk – The Dialectic of the Hemlock
  • William Brooke – The Formal Failure and Social Success of Logic
  • Jesse Robertson – Theorizing Progress in the Black Canoe
  • Anthony Sangiuliano – Defending the Kantian Approach to Justification and Legitimacy.

Popular posts from this blog

2019 Winner: Nelson Guedes

Nelson Guedes is a student at the University of Victoria majoring in Philosophy. He is working on a transdisciplinary theory that provides a strong foundation for knowledge. He plans to use his theory to address a wide variety of social-economic problems. His interests include, inter alia, general systems theory, complexity science, game theory, metaphysics, philosophy of law & political philosophy, Zen Buddhism and Taoism. Law as an Emergent Natural Phenomenon Abstract: Increasing instability in foreign relations threatens to breakdown the decentralized international legal order. In this paper, I examine the natural decentralized emergence of law, the difficulties the international legal order is facing and the sources of instability. I will then tap into insights from decentralized indigenous legal orders and use those insights to address the difficulties the international legal order is facing. Finally, I will briefly present a solution that creates a stable decentralized inter...

2021 Winner: Nicholas Duguay

Nicholas Duguay is completing an Honours degree in Philosophy at Concordia University, where he also studied Mandarin. His primary interests in philosophy are in liberal theory and its critiques (from both Western and other philosophical traditions). In particular, Nicholas is interested in the state and its legitimacy, as well as in the debate between neutralists and perfectionists over whether the state can (and/or should) promote certain conceptions of the good. Beyond the classroom, Nicholas enjoys writing poetry and songs, cycling, and spending time with his family. Download the 2021 paper, The Problem of Stability: A Case for Civic Friendship in the Rawlsian Society. 2021 Short List Congratulations to the the following applicants whose papers were short listed for the Keenan Prize this year: Eleanor Hamilton from Concordia University – Putting the Judge in Prejudice Tyler Paetkau from University of Alberta – Environmental Racism and the Capabilities Approach to Justice: Private ...

2020 Winner: Sophia Whicher

Sophia Whicher recently graduated from the University of Toronto with a double major in Philosophy and Ethics, Society and Law. She is especially interested in Ethics and the Philosophy of Emotions, and their intersection with the public sphere, including our political and legal systems. One of her favourite parts of her degree was being able to teach, and she hopes to incorporate teaching philosophy and the spirit of inquisitive learning it encourages into her future. Outside of her academic life, she enjoys travelling, drinking tea, and annoying her partner by tirelessly asking questions about everything. Legal Positivism and a Dynamic Picture of the Law Abstract: The question of whether there is a necessary connection between law and morality is one which manifests concretely in the aftermath of immoral legal systems. In this paper, I use the post-war German Grudge Informer cases as a lens through which to examine HLA Hart’s defence of the Separation Thesis. In thinking about what ...